Revising my take on Charlie Kirk

In my last post I said I thought this was a professional hit. There was clearly more than one person involved (George Zinn). Now I'm starting to doubt whether Kirk is even dead at all. Here are the questions I have that lead toward that assessment:

Where is the blood spatter? Several men were seen carrying the body to an SUV, including one with a brown plaid shirt who many online sleuths are calling the *real* assassin. He was obviously working with a team of people. There is no blood trail leading to the SUV. When this all happened we were told Kirk was in critical condition, obviously he was still alive. HIs blood wouldn't have stopped pumping. There should have been blood all over the place, but Kirk didn't even have blood on his shoes.

Why did they just pick him up like that? Someone shot in the neck? That could cause a spinal injury. Why didn't they apply pressure to the wound? Why didn't they treat the crime scene like a crime scene? Where's the bullet? Where's the autopsy? We have footage of Erika mourning a coffin. Who took that picture? Isn't that a little disrespectful? She holds his hands, but his hands don't look real. I'm not surprised. If the guy in the brown shirt helped carry him to the SUV, did he even go to a hospital? I'm sorry, I just don't buy her press conference, or what she told her daughter. I'm not going to put up a bunch of links about this, but if you look into it you'd better hurry before they scrub the whole thing. This was all done in a very public way, and the press is fanning the flame of devisive emotion. Why?