A lot has happened in the last few days and I guess I'd better address a couple of them because they would appear to contradict a couple of my most recent hoax allegations.
First off, Jahar Tsarnaev was formally sentenced to death in federal court. Surprisingly, he was given an opportunity to speak and actually did say something. Well, that's what the reporters say anyway, because cameras and recording devices were not allowed in the courtroom, which is why the general public haven't seen hide nor hair from the kid since his arrest except some cartoons that make him look decades older than he actually is.
We're told that Tsarnaev thanked his attorneys (who pretty much sent him to death row with their opening statement) and then, to make absolutely sure there's no confusion, admitted his guilt and said he was sorry in a "thick Russian accent."
Now, I have a bit of a problem with this, because I know Jahar doesn't have a thick Russian accent. His friends have been known to say they weren't even aware he had been born outside this country. I've heard him speak to his niece in baby talk. It's hard to tell if people have an accent in this context, but he certainly isn't "hard to understand." His older brother Tamerlan has an accent, but he was seven years older than Jahar when he came to America! Jahar was in the third grade (8-9 years old) when he came to America. Generally, if you are immersed in a language before puberty you learn to speak it without an accent. I know something about this because I was an exchange student to France for a year when I was 16 years old. People could tell I was a foreigner but couldn't say where I was from.
So, the obvious question to ask is, "was that the real Jahar who confessed, or just another actor, or ... was Jahar just an actor all along?" Because there's no way the Boston marathon bombing was for real, folks. I've looked at the evidence, and I won't be retracting that opinion no matter what I hear journalists say this guy with the thick Russian accent said.
The next thing that seemingly calls into question my contention that the Charleston shootings were a hoax is the fact that the body of Rev. Pinckney is being laid out for all to see at the South Carolina State House. But the obvious question to ask here is, could that be as fake as everything else? There has been much speculation that Lenin's body was wax-works in the vein of Madame Tussaud. Is that really Rev. Pinckney's body everyone's looking at? If it is, that doesn't exclude the possibility that this shooting was a false flag, just with real victims. But somehow, I don't think so. Anyway that's what I think, and that's just my opinion. You're welcome to your own.
Thanks to dublinsmick in the comments for the link to these vids from RedSilverJ that support my contention that the Charleston Shooting was indeed a hoax:
More crummy acting:
Leave room in the margins
3 hours ago